Futures8 min read
NQ vs MNQ: sizing Nasdaq futures responsibly
See NQ vs MNQ contract size side by side, with CME multipliers, tick values, calendar-spread increments, and neutral sizing examples you can verify.
By TerraTrade Team

Why NQ vs MNQ contract size matters for risk#
This guide compares the E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures (NQ) and the Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures (MNQ) by contract multiplier, tick size, and tick value directly from CME Group product specifications. It then walks through neutral, illustrative sizing math so you can translate an index move into dollars and align your position size with a predefined risk budget. All contract facts are verifiable on the CME pages cited inline, and you should always re-check live exchange specifications before trading because product parameters and margin requirements can change E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupSPAN MINIMUM PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTS.
NQ vs MNQ at a glance#
- NQ multiplier: $20 × Nasdaq-100 Index. A 1.00 index-point move changes P&L by $20 per NQ contract E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- MNQ multiplier: $2 × Nasdaq-100 Index. A 1.00 index-point move changes P&L by $2 per MNQ contract Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- Minimum price fluctuation (outright) for both NQ and MNQ: 0.25 index points per tick NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- Dollar value of one tick (outright): NQ tick = 0.25 × $20 = $5.00; MNQ tick = 0.25 × $2 = $0.50 NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures.
- Immediate takeaway: one NQ contract has the same per-point exposure as ten MNQ contracts because $20 ÷ $2 = 10, and tick values scale the same way ($5.00 vs $0.50) E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.

| Contract | Contract multiplier (P&L per 1.00 index point) | Minimum tick (outright) in index points | Dollar value per minimum tick (outright) | Calendar-spread minimum tick (index points) | Calendar-spread tick value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NQ (E-mini Nasdaq-100) | $20 per index point E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group | 0.25 NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options | $5.00 (0.25 × $20) NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options | 0.05 NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options | $1.00 (0.05 × $20) NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options |
| MNQ (Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100) | $2 per index point Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group | 0.25 Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group | $0.50 (0.25 × $2) Micro E-mini Futures | 0.05 Micro E-mini Futures | $0.10 (0.05 × $2) Micro E-mini Futures |
From ticks to dollars: the sizing math#
Two simple formulas turn index movement into dollars:
- Dollars per index point = contract multiplier. NQ: $20; MNQ: $2 E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- Dollars per minimum tick = (minimum tick in index points) × (contract multiplier). With a 0.25-point tick, NQ = 0.25 × $20 = $5.00; MNQ = 0.25 × $2 = $0.50 NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures.
These definitions come from CME’s contract-specification pages and product fact materials and are the foundation for neutral, mechanical position sizing E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupNASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Futures.
A 5-step position-sizing checklist for Nasdaq futures#
- Define a maximum dollar risk per trade (e.g., $R).
- Specify your stop distance in index points (or ticks) based on your trade idea. Convert ticks to points: 4 ticks × 0.25 = 1.00 index point NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures.
- Compute per-contract risk: per‑contract risk = stop_distance_points × multiplier (NQ: $20; MNQ: $2) E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- Solve contract count: contracts = target_dollar_risk ÷ per‑contract_risk. Ensure the result does not exceed $R; MNQ offers finer granularity due to its smaller multiplier Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- Re‑verify live CME specs and current margin/performance bond requirements before placing a trade; clearing minimums change and brokers can require more than the exchange minimum SPAN MINIMUM PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTSBasics of Futures Trading | CFTC.
Neutral sizing examples (illustrative only)#
The following illustrations translate stop distance into dollar risk using only CME multipliers and tick sizes. They are not trading recommendations and assume no slippage or fees for simplicity. Futures use margin and leverage, which amplify gains and losses; size within a pre-defined risk budget and understand your broker’s requirements Basics of Futures Trading | CFTCSPAN MINIMUM PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTS.
Example A — Same stop distance: 1 NQ vs MNQ#
- Stop distance = 10.0 index points.
- NQ per‑contract dollar risk = 10.0 × $20 = $200 E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- MNQ per‑contract dollar risk = 10.0 × $2 = $20 Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- To approximate 1 NQ’s risk with MNQ at the same stop: $200 ÷ $20 = 10 MNQ.
Example B — Solve contracts for a target dollar risk#
- Target max risk per trade = $100.
- Stop distance = 5.0 index points.
- NQ per contract: 5.0 × $20 = $100 → 1 NQ matches $100 E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- MNQ per contract: 5.0 × $2 = $10 → contracts needed = $100 ÷ $10 = 10 MNQ Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
Example C — Very small risk / fine granularity#
- Stop distance = 2.5 index points (10 ticks of 0.25).
- NQ: 2.5 × $20 = $50 per contract E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupNASDAQ-100 Futures and Options.
- MNQ: 2.5 × $2 = $5 per contract Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Futures.
- To approximate $50 with MNQ: $50 ÷ $5 = 10 MNQ.
Example D — Tick-level arithmetic#
- NQ tick = 0.25 index points = $5.00; 4 ticks = 1.00 index point = $20 per contract NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options.
- MNQ tick = 0.25 index points = $0.50; 4 ticks = 1.00 index point = $2 per contract Micro E-mini Futures.
Notional exposure and granularity#
Notional value = index_level × contract_multiplier. Using a hypothetical index level of 15,000 (insert the live level when you evaluate your own trade):
- NQ notional ≈ 15,000 × $20 = $300,000 per contract E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
- MNQ notional ≈ 15,000 × $2 = $30,000 per contract Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
This illustrates why MNQ is commonly used to scale exposure in smaller steps: it is 1/10 the notional size of NQ by design Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group.
Calendar spreads use different minimums#
If you trade calendar spreads (long one expiry, short another), the minimum price fluctuation is smaller than for outrights: 0.05 index points for both NQ and MNQ. Given the multipliers, that equates to $1.00 per spread tick for NQ (0.05 × $20) and $0.10 per spread tick for MNQ (0.05 × $2) NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures. These increments apply specifically to spreads and differ from the 0.25-point tick used in outright months NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures.
Choosing NQ vs MNQ: strengths and limitations
Strengths when sizing
- ✓MNQ provides fine-grained control over dollar risk: $0.50 per tick and $2 per index point let you scale position size to a small risk budget (Source: Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group) (Source: Micro E-mini Futures).
- ✓NQ concentrates exposure: $5.00 per tick and $20 per index point reduce contract count for the same notional, which some traders prefer for simplicity (Source: NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options).
- ✓Both products share the same underlying index and tick increment in index points for outrights (0.25), making conversions straightforward (10 MNQ ≈ 1 NQ) (Source: E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group) (Source: Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group).
Limitations to keep in mind
- —NQ’s $5.00 tick and $20 per point can create larger per-contract P&L swings; traders with small risk budgets may find it hard to stay within limits using a single NQ contract (Source: NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options).
- —MNQ’s smaller tick and per-point value can mean more contracts to reach a given exposure, which increases the number of fills you must manage; execution quality is always a consideration (general trading consideration).
- —Calendar-spread tick sizes differ from outrights; using the wrong increment can lead to sizing or order-entry mistakes if you don’t double-check the product and strategy type (Source: NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options) (Source: Micro E-mini Futures).
FAQ: NQ vs MNQ contract size and sizing practice#
Is MNQ exactly one-tenth the size of NQ?
One NQ has a $20-per-point multiplier while one MNQ has a $2-per-point multiplier. That 10:1 ratio means ten MNQ contracts have the same per-point exposure as one NQ contract, and the tick values scale accordingly ($5.00 vs $0.50) E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini Futures.
What are the tick sizes and tick values for NQ and MNQ?
For outright months, both markets quote in 0.25 index-point ticks. With NQ’s $20 multiplier, one tick = 0.25 × $20 = $5.00. With MNQ’s $2 multiplier, one tick = 0.25 × $2 = $0.50 NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures.
Do calendar spreads use different tick increments?
Yes. For calendar spreads, the minimum price fluctuation is 0.05 index points. That equals $1.00 per tick for NQ and $0.10 for MNQ given their multipliers NASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Futures.
How do margin requirements factor into position sizing?
CME Clearing sets and updates minimum performance-bond (initial margin) levels. These change with market conditions, and brokers may require more than the exchange minimum. Always check the latest CME clearing advisories and your broker’s requirements when sizing SPAN MINIMUM PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTSBasics of Futures Trading | CFTC.
Are there options on MNQ?
Yes. CME lists options on Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures; consult the micro options specification and FAQs for contract-unit and quoting details Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Options Contract Specs - CME GroupFAQ: Micro E-mini S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 Options - CME Group.
Where to verify these numbers#
Verification sources for every numeric claim in this guide are CME Group’s contract-specification pages and product fact materials for NQ and MNQ, plus CME Clearing performance-bond notices and the CFTC’s overview of futures risks. Re-check those pages before you trade: contract specifications and margin minimums can change E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupNASDAQ-100 Futures and OptionsMicro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME GroupMicro E-mini FuturesSPAN MINIMUM PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTSBasics of Futures Trading | CFTC.
Bottom line: size by dollars, verify the specs#
Sources#
- E-mini Nasdaq-100 Futures Contract Specs - CME Group — cmegroup.com
- NASDAQ-100 Futures and Options — cmegroup.com
- Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Futures Contract Specs - CME Group — cmegroup.com
- Micro E-mini Futures — cmegroup.com
- Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 Index Options Contract Specs - CME Group — cmegroup.com
- FAQ: Micro E-mini Equity Index Futures - CME Group — cmegroup.com
- FAQ: Micro E-mini S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 Options - CME Group — cmegroup.com
- Trading Micro E-mini Options — cmegroup.com
- Basics of Futures Trading | CFTC — cftc.gov
- SPAN MINIMUM PERFORMANCE BOND REQUIREMENTS — cmegroup.com
KEEP READING

Backtesting8 min read
How many trades does a backtest need?
There’s no magic trade count. Learn how to size a backtest for confidence, cover regimes, and avoid false certainty using sample‑size math and validation steps.
Read post
Comparisons5 min read
TraderSync vs TerraTrade for Journaling
TraderSync claims 700+ broker integrations. TerraTrade matches every fill to the cent and includes backtesting and replay. A price-by-price, honest comparison.
Read post
Comparisons5 min read
TerraTrade vs TradingView for Backtesting
Pine Script's Strategy Tester and Bar Replay against a purpose-built manual backtester with honest fills, prop-firm rules, and a journal underneath.
Read post